Government 'wrong to balance books on backs of low-income families'

Responding to Chancellor Rachel Reeves' recent Spring Statement, think tank the Resolution Foundation stated that balancing the books 'shouldn't be done on the backs of low-income families'.

28 Mar 2025

Responding to Chancellor Rachel Reeves' recent Spring Statement, think tank the Resolution Foundation stated that balancing the books 'shouldn't be done on the backs of low-income families'.

The Foundation said that due to a deterioration in the outlook for the public finances a 'fresh fiscal consolidation' was needed in the Spring Statement to meet the Chancellor's fiscal rules.

However, with £4.8 billion in savings coming from welfare changes, it predicts that 3.2 million families will be, on average, £1,700 worse off.

The Resolution Foundation labelled Ms Reeves' approach as 'unbalanced', and stated that it risks causing 'significant damage' to many families' living standards.

Ruth Curtice, Chief Executive of the Resolution Foundation, commented: 'While the Chancellor was right to balance the books, she was wrong to do so on the backs of low-to-middle income families, on whom two-thirds of the welfare cuts will fall. Over three million households will be worse off as a result of welfare changes.'

Aside image

Accountancy services tailored to you.

Find out more »

Aside image

Are you tired of bookkeeping?

Find out more »

Aside image

Is your business just starting up?

Find out more »

Aside image

Are you paying the right amount of VAT?

Find out more »

Aside image

Struggling with your self assessment tax return?

Find out more »

Aside image

Looking for more than just compliance services?

Find out more »

Why not register to receive our Monthly Newswire?

Once a month we'll send you an email packed full of essential business news and handy tax tips to help save you money.

Sign up now